To advance Thomas B. Hagen on the retired list of the Navy.
Summary
This bill, H.R. 4547, aims to advance Captain Thomas B. Hagen on the retired list of the Navy to the rank of rear admiral (lower half). This is a specific action focused on recognizing the service of an individual. The bill explicitly states that this advancement will not affect his retired pay or other benefits, nor will it impact benefits for any other person based on his military service.
Expected Effects
If enacted, Captain Hagen will be recognized as a rear admiral (lower half) on the retired list. This change is largely symbolic, as it does not alter his existing benefits or create new financial obligations. The impact is primarily honorific, acknowledging his service.
Potential Benefits
- Recognition of service: Acknowledges Captain Hagen's contributions to the Navy.
- Precedent: May set a precedent for similar recognition of other distinguished service members.
- Morale boost: Could positively influence morale within the Navy by demonstrating appreciation for long service.
- Symbolic value: Reinforces the importance of military service and dedication.
- No additional cost: The bill explicitly states that no additional benefits will accrue, minimizing financial impact.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for inequity: Could be perceived as unfair if similar recognition is not extended to other deserving individuals.
- Limited impact: The change is largely symbolic and may not have tangible benefits for Captain Hagen or the Navy.
- Resource allocation: Time and resources spent on this bill could be directed to broader issues affecting the military.
- Risk of politicization: Individual recognition can sometimes be influenced by political considerations rather than merit alone.
- Lack of transparency: The criteria for such advancements may not be clear, leading to questions of fairness.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the powers granted to Congress under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, which provides for the establishment and maintenance of a Navy. While the Constitution does not explicitly address the advancement of retired officers, this action can be seen as an exercise of Congress's authority to regulate the armed forces. The bill does not appear to infringe upon any individual rights or liberties protected by the Constitution or its amendments.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).