Stop Anarchists From Endangering Cities Act; SAFE Cities Act
Summary
The Stop Anarchists From Endangering Cities Act (SAFE Cities Act) directs the Attorney General to identify and publish a list of "anarchist jurisdictions," defined as state or local governments that have refused to take reasonable steps to stop violence and destruction of property. The Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, will publish and regularly update this list. Federal agencies will then be guided to restrict or disfavor these jurisdictions in the receipt of federal grants.
Expected Effects
The Act could lead to reduced federal funding for states and localities deemed to be anarchist jurisdictions. This could affect a wide range of services and programs within those jurisdictions. It may also incentivize local governments to take a more aggressive approach to managing protests and unrest.
Potential Benefits
- Could lead to a reduction in violence and destruction of property if jurisdictions take more proactive measures.
- May provide greater clarity and consistency in the federal government's response to unrest in different localities.
- Could incentivize local law enforcement to accept federal assistance, potentially improving public safety during widespread disturbances.
- Could ensure that federal resources are not being used to support jurisdictions that are perceived to be enabling lawlessness.
- May lead to increased accountability for local governments in addressing violence and property destruction.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- The definition of "anarchist jurisdiction" is subjective and could be applied unfairly or politically.
- Restricting federal funding could harm vulnerable populations and essential services in affected jurisdictions.
- The Act could infringe on the autonomy of state and local governments.
- It may chill free speech and the right to protest if local governments become overly aggressive in suppressing dissent to avoid being labeled an "anarchist jurisdiction."
- The Act could create a climate of distrust between the federal government and local communities.
Constitutional Alignment
The Act's constitutionality is questionable. It potentially infringes on states' rights under the Tenth Amendment, which reserves powers not delegated to the federal government to the states. The First Amendment implications are also significant, as the Act could incentivize restrictions on freedom of speech and assembly to avoid being labeled an "anarchist jurisdiction." However, the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8) could be invoked to justify federal intervention if violence and property destruction substantially affect interstate commerce.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).