S.Res.22 - Concerning the National Collegiate Athletic Association policy for eligibility in women’s sports. (119th Congress)
Summary
Senate Resolution 22 addresses the National Collegiate Athletic Association's (NCAA) policy on transgender student-athlete eligibility in women's sports. The resolution calls for the NCAA to revoke its current policy, which the resolution argues discriminates against female athletes. It urges the NCAA to implement a biological sex-based policy and encourages all sports-governing bodies to protect women's sports for biological women and girls.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this resolution would likely pressure the NCAA to change its current policy regarding transgender athletes. This could lead to the exclusion of transgender women from participating in women's collegiate sports. The resolution's impact extends to potentially influencing other sports-governing bodies to adopt similar policies.
Potential Benefits
- Protection of opportunities for biological female athletes.
- Ensuring fair competition in women's sports.
- Reinforcing the integrity of women's sports categories.
- Promoting safety for female athletes during competition.
- Aligning collegiate sports policies with biological realities, as perceived by supporters.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential discrimination against transgender student-athletes.
- Possible legal challenges based on Title IX and equal protection principles.
- Negative impact on the mental and emotional well-being of transgender athletes.
- Reduced inclusivity in collegiate sports.
- Damage to the NCAA's reputation regarding diversity and inclusion.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution's alignment with the US Constitution is complex. Supporters might argue it aligns with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by ensuring fair competition for biological females. Opponents could argue it violates the same clause by discriminating against transgender individuals. The resolution also touches on Title IX, which prohibits sex-based discrimination in education programs receiving federal funding; the interpretation of 'sex' in this context is a key point of contention. The Tenth Amendment, reserving powers not delegated to the federal government to the states or the people, could be invoked regarding the federal government's role in influencing the policies of a private organization like the NCAA.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).