S.413 - Plum Island Preservation Study Act (119th Congress)
Summary
The Plum Island Preservation Study Act directs the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study on Plum Island to determine the appropriateness of designating it as a unit of the National Park System or the National Wildlife Refuge System, or providing protection for its resources through other means. The study will evaluate the national significance of the area, consult with stakeholders, and identify cost estimates for potential federal actions. A report detailing the study's findings and recommendations will be submitted to Congress within three years of funding availability.
Expected Effects
The immediate effect will be the allocation of resources to conduct the study. The long-term effect could be the preservation of Plum Island as a national park or wildlife refuge, or some other form of resource protection. This could impact public access, environmental conservation, and local economies.
Potential Benefits
- Potential preservation of a unique ecosystem and historical site.
- Increased recreational opportunities for the public if designated as a park or refuge.
- Economic benefits from tourism and related activities.
- Enhanced scientific research opportunities.
- Protection of cultural heritage resources on the island.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential restrictions on private development and use of the island.
- Costs associated with federal acquisition, development, and maintenance.
- Potential displacement of existing operations or activities on the island.
- Possible negative impacts on local economies if access is restricted.
- Delays in decision-making due to the study process.
Constitutional Alignment
The act appears to align with the Constitution, particularly the Property Clause (Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2), which grants Congress the power to dispose of and regulate federal property. The study itself does not infringe on any specific constitutional rights. The act also aligns with the General Welfare clause of the preamble.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).