S.353 - Commission to Relocate the Federal Bureaucracy Act (119th Congress)
Summary
S.353, the "Commission to Relocate the Federal Bureaucracy Act," proposes establishing a commission to study the feasibility and impact of relocating certain federal agencies outside the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. The commission would be composed of various high-ranking government officials and tasked with submitting a report to Congress within one year. The report would consider factors such as financial efficiency, existing infrastructure, and community engagement in potential relocation sites.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this bill could lead to the relocation of federal agencies and employees, potentially shifting economic activity and jobs to other areas of the United States. The composition of the commission suggests a focus on cost savings and efficiency in government operations. The bill also prioritizes community engagement and consideration of local factors in the relocation process.
Potential Benefits
- Potential for economic revitalization in areas outside of Washington, D.C.
- Reduced cost of living for federal employees who relocate.
- Increased efficiency in government operations through strategic relocation.
- Opportunities for public-private partnerships in new locations.
- Alignment with workforce trends, such as increased telework.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential disruption to federal agency operations during relocation.
- Costs associated with relocating agencies and employees.
- Possible negative impact on the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area economy.
- Resistance from employees unwilling to relocate.
- Risk of reduced access to policymakers and stakeholders for relocated agencies.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the Constitution, as it falls within the powers granted to Congress to organize and manage the federal government under Article I, Section 8. The establishment of a commission to study agency relocation is a legitimate exercise of congressional authority. The bill does not appear to infringe on any specific constitutional rights or protections.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).