Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan.
Summary
This joint resolution aims to disapprove the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) "Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan." It was submitted by Mr. Begich in the House of Representatives and referred to the Committee on Natural Resources. The resolution utilizes the Congressional Review Act to potentially nullify the BLM's rule.
Expected Effects
If passed, the resolution would prevent the BLM's Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan from taking effect. This would maintain the status quo prior to the BLM's decision. The resolution expresses Congressional disapproval of the BLM's actions.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially allows Congress to check the power of the executive branch and regulatory agencies.
- Could lead to a re-evaluation of the resource management plan, potentially incorporating different stakeholder perspectives.
- May address concerns about the environmental or economic impacts of the BLM's plan.
- Could ensure greater transparency and public input in future resource management decisions.
- Upholds Congress's oversight role in federal regulations.
Potential Disadvantages
- Could disrupt resource management planning in the Central Yukon region.
- May delay or prevent implementation of measures intended to protect the environment or promote responsible resource development.
- Could create uncertainty for businesses and communities that rely on the resources managed by the BLM.
- May be viewed as an overreach of congressional authority into executive branch functions.
- Could lead to political gridlock and hinder effective governance.
Constitutional Alignment
This resolution invokes Congress's legislative power under Article I, Section 1, which vests all legislative powers in Congress. The Congressional Review Act, under which this resolution is brought, is intended to provide a check on the executive branch's regulatory actions, aligning with the principle of separation of powers. The resolution itself does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or protections.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).