Prohibition of Agricultural Land for Foreign Adversaries Act
Summary
The "Prohibition of Agricultural Land for Foreign Adversaries Act" aims to prevent individuals or entities associated with the governments of North Korea, Iran, China, and Russia from purchasing agricultural land in the United States. It also restricts their participation in most Department of Agriculture programs. The bill grants the President authority to implement these prohibitions, utilizing powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, and imposes penalties for violations.
Expected Effects
This act would likely lead to a decrease in foreign investment in US agricultural land from the specified countries. It may also impact the participation of individuals or entities associated with those countries in USDA programs, potentially affecting agricultural research and development. The bill could also lead to diplomatic tensions with the named countries.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced national security by limiting control of agricultural resources by potential adversaries.
- Protection of domestic agricultural interests.
- Reduced risk of espionage or sabotage related to food production.
- Increased public confidence in the security of the food supply.
- Potential for increased investment from other, non-adversarial nations.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for retaliatory measures from the targeted countries.
- Possible chilling effect on foreign investment in US agriculture generally.
- Increased administrative burden for enforcing the prohibitions.
- Risk of legal challenges based on discrimination or due process.
- Limited impact if adversaries use indirect methods to acquire land.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's alignment with the Constitution is complex. While the federal government has broad authority over foreign commerce and national security, as implied by Article I, Section 8, clauses dealing with commerce and defense, the bill could be challenged under the Fifth Amendment's due process clause if it is applied in an arbitrary or discriminatory manner. The power granted to the President to implement the act relies on existing legislation (IEEPA), which has been subject to constitutional scrutiny regarding the delegation of legislative authority.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).