Parity in Diplomatic Security Investigations Act
Summary
The Parity in Diplomatic Security Investigations Act aims to streamline the process by which Diplomatic Security special agents can obtain authorization to intercept wire, oral, or electronic communications. It proposes delegating pre-approval authority from the Secretary of State to the Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security or the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security. This change seeks to align the Department of State's procedures with those of other federal law enforcement agencies, potentially improving the efficiency of investigations.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this act would expedite the process for Diplomatic Security special agents to obtain necessary approvals for intercepting communications during investigations. This could lead to more timely access to critical information. It also mandates an update to the Foreign Affairs Manual to reflect this delegation of authority.
Potential Benefits
- Enhanced efficiency in Diplomatic Security investigations.
- More timely access to critical information for law enforcement.
- Improved accountability and public confidence in law enforcement efforts through recordings.
- Alignment of Department of State procedures with other federal law enforcement agencies.
- Better ability to carry out duties related to security and law enforcement.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for abuse of power if oversight is insufficient.
- Risk of privacy violations if interception is not properly regulated.
- Possible increase in surveillance activities, raising concerns about civil liberties.
- Could strain resources if the delegated authority leads to a surge in requests.
- May create inconsistencies in application if different Assistant Secretaries have varying interpretations.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The act's alignment with the US Constitution hinges on adherence to the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. The proposed delegation must ensure that all interceptions of communications are conducted in accordance with established legal standards and judicial oversight, as required by the Fourth Amendment. The act references section 2516 of title 18, which provides a framework for obtaining warrants for electronic surveillance, suggesting an intent to comply with constitutional requirements.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).