Kay Hagan Tick Reauthorization Act
Summary
The Kay Hagan Tick Reauthorization Act aims to extend funding for programs addressing vector-borne diseases, particularly those transmitted by ticks. It reauthorizes two key sections of the Public Health Service Act, namely Section 317U and Section 2822(c). The bill adjusts the funding levels for these programs for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
Expected Effects
The Act will ensure continued support for national strategies and regional centers of excellence focused on vector-borne diseases. It also provides ongoing assistance to health departments in managing and addressing these diseases. However, the funding levels are slightly reduced compared to the previous authorization period.
Potential Benefits
- Continued research and prevention efforts for tick-borne diseases.
- Support for regional centers of excellence in vector-borne disease research.
- Enhanced assistance to health departments for disease surveillance and control.
- Potential for improved public awareness and education regarding tick-borne illnesses.
- Focus on a critical public health issue.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Reduced funding levels compared to the previous authorization period (slight decrease).
- Potential impact on the scope and effectiveness of programs due to decreased funding.
- The bill does not introduce new initiatives or expand the scope of existing programs significantly.
- Reliance on existing infrastructure and strategies, potentially missing opportunities for innovation.
- Limited focus on the underlying environmental factors contributing to the spread of tick-borne diseases.
Constitutional Alignment
The Act aligns with the Constitution's mandate to "promote the general Welfare" (Preamble). Congress has the power to allocate funds for public health initiatives under the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8). The Act does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).