H.R.es504 - Removing a certain Member from certain standing committees of the House of Representatives. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.Res. 504 proposes the removal of Representative LaMonica McIver from the Committee on Homeland Security and the Committee on Small Business. The resolution is based on a three-count Federal indictment against Rep. McIver for allegedly impeding and interfering with Federal officers. The resolution was submitted by Mrs. Luna on June 11, 2025, and referred to the Committee on Ethics.
Expected Effects
If passed, H.Res. 504 would immediately remove Representative McIver from her positions on the specified House committees. This would reduce her influence on matters related to homeland security and small business. It may also signal a formal condemnation of her alleged actions, pending the outcome of the legal proceedings.
Potential Benefits
- Upholds ethical standards within the House of Representatives.
- Maintains the integrity of committee proceedings by ensuring members are not compromised by legal issues.
- Demonstrates accountability to the public.
- Prevents potential conflicts of interest that could arise from a member facing federal charges continuing to serve on committees.
- Reinforces the principle that elected officials are subject to the rule of law.
Potential Disadvantages
- Could be perceived as a premature judgment before the legal process is complete.
- May deprive the constituents of New Jersey's representative on key committees.
- Could set a precedent for removing members based on indictments rather than convictions.
- May be viewed as politically motivated, depending on the circumstances and timing.
- Could potentially impact the representative's ability to effectively serve her constituents.
Constitutional Alignment
The Constitution grants each house of Congress the power to determine the rules of its proceedings and to punish its members for disorderly behavior (Article I, Section 5). Removing a member from a committee assignment falls under the House's power to govern its internal affairs. However, due process considerations might arise if the removal is perceived as a punishment before a conviction.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).