H.R.3935 - Reducing Permitting Uncertainty Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 3935, the "Reducing Permitting Uncertainty Act," aims to amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. The bill focuses on Section 404(c) concerning the specification of disposal sites for dredged or fill material. It seeks to limit the period during which the Administrator (likely of the EPA) can prohibit or restrict the use of defined areas as disposal sites.
Expected Effects
The bill would likely expedite the permitting process for projects involving dredged or fill material in waterways. This could lead to faster approval times for construction and development projects impacting wetlands and other water bodies. The changes would apply to permit applications submitted after the enactment of the Act.
Potential Benefits
- Faster Project Approvals: Streamlines the permitting process, potentially accelerating infrastructure development.
- Reduced Uncertainty for Applicants: Provides a defined timeframe for the Administrator's decision-making process.
- Economic Development: Could stimulate economic activity by reducing delays in project implementation.
- Clarity in Regulations: Aims to clarify the period during which the Administrator can act on permit applications.
Potential Disadvantages
- Environmental Concerns: Could lead to less thorough environmental reviews and potential harm to aquatic ecosystems.
- Reduced Public Input: The expedited timeframe might limit opportunities for public hearings and input.
- Weakened Regulatory Oversight: May weaken the Administrator's ability to protect sensitive areas from harmful disposal practices.
- Potential for Abuse: Could incentivize applicants to submit incomplete information initially, only to complete it later and trigger the start of the prohibition period.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with Congress's power to regulate commerce and navigable waters, as outlined in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. However, the potential impact on environmental protection could raise questions about the government's responsibility to promote the general welfare. The bill does not appear to infringe on any specific individual rights or freedoms enumerated in the Bill of Rights.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).