H.R.3667 - Strengthening American Nuclear Energy Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.3667, the Strengthening American Nuclear Energy Act, seeks to codify several Executive Orders related to nuclear energy issued on May 23, 2025. These orders cover reforming nuclear reactor testing, deploying advanced nuclear reactor technologies for national security, reforming the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and reinvigorating the nuclear industrial base. The bill aims to give these executive actions the full force and effect of law.
Expected Effects
If enacted, H.R.3667 would make the policies outlined in the specified Executive Orders more permanent and less susceptible to reversal by future administrations. This could lead to increased investment and development in nuclear energy technologies. It would also alter the regulatory landscape for nuclear energy, potentially streamlining processes and encouraging innovation.
Potential Benefits
- Increased Energy Security: Promotes domestic nuclear energy production, reducing reliance on foreign energy sources.
- Job Creation: Supports the nuclear industry, leading to new jobs in manufacturing, engineering, and construction.
- Technological Advancement: Encourages the development and deployment of advanced nuclear reactor technologies.
- National Security: Enhances national security by utilizing nuclear technology for defense purposes.
- Streamlined Regulation: Reforms the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, potentially making the approval process more efficient.
Potential Disadvantages
- Environmental Risks: Increased nuclear activity could raise concerns about nuclear waste disposal and potential accidents.
- Reduced Oversight: Reforming the Nuclear Regulatory Commission might lead to reduced safety oversight.
- Potential for Cost Overruns: Nuclear projects are often expensive and can exceed budget, burdening taxpayers.
- Lack of Public Input: Codifying executive orders bypasses the normal legislative process, limiting public debate.
- Unproven Technologies: Advanced nuclear reactor technologies may not be fully tested or proven safe.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's attempt to codify Executive Orders raises questions regarding the separation of powers, as outlined in Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution, which vests all legislative powers in Congress. While Congress has the power to enact laws, the codification of Executive Orders might be seen as an abdication of its legislative responsibilities. The constitutionality would depend on whether the original executive orders were within the president's constitutional authority.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).