H.R.1029 - To abolish the United States Agency for International Development. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 1029 proposes to abolish the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The bill directs that no federal funds be made available to carry out USAID's functions, duties, or responsibilities, as defined by the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and other laws. It also rescinds any unobligated funds held by USAID and transfers the agency's assets and liabilities to the Secretary of State.
Expected Effects
If enacted, USAID would cease to exist, and its functions would either be discontinued or transferred to other entities, potentially the Department of State. This could lead to a significant shift in how the U.S. engages in international development and assistance. The immediate effect would be the rescission of USAID's current funding.
Potential Benefits
- Potential cost savings by eliminating an entire agency.
- Streamlining of foreign aid efforts if functions are consolidated elsewhere.
- Re-evaluation of the effectiveness and purpose of U.S. foreign aid.
- Could allow for a shift in focus to other areas of government spending.
- May reduce perceived bureaucracy associated with international development.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Disruption of ongoing international development programs.
- Potential loss of expertise and institutional knowledge within USAID.
- Negative impact on countries and populations that rely on U.S. aid.
- Damage to U.S. diplomatic relations and influence.
- Possible duplication of efforts and inefficiencies if functions are transferred to other agencies.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill falls under Congress's power to allocate funds and determine the structure of government agencies, as outlined in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. Specifically, Congress has the power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States. The abolishment of an agency and reallocation of its funds is within this purview.
However, the potential impact on international relations and treaty obligations could raise questions about the executive branch's authority in foreign affairs. The bill itself does not violate any specific constitutional provision, but its consequences could affect the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).