H.R.1022 - Words Matter for the District of Columbia Courts Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R. 1022, the "Words Matter for the District of Columbia Courts Act," aims to modernize the language used in Title 11 of the District of Columbia Official Code. Specifically, it replaces outdated and potentially offensive terms like "substantially retarded persons" and "the at least moderately mentally retarded" with the more respectful and accurate phrase "persons with moderate intellectual disabilities.
This change affects the jurisdiction of the United States District Court, the Superior Court, and the Family Court within the District of Columbia. The bill reflects a broader effort to promote dignity and respect in legal terminology.
The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives by Ms. Norton on February 5, 2025, and referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Expected Effects
The primary effect of this bill will be to update the language used in the District of Columbia Official Code to be more respectful and accurate when referring to individuals with intellectual disabilities.
This will likely lead to increased sensitivity and awareness within the legal system regarding the appropriate terminology to use when discussing or addressing individuals with intellectual disabilities. It sets a positive example for other jurisdictions to follow in modernizing their legal language.
Potential Benefits
- Promotes Dignity and Respect: Replaces offensive language with respectful terminology.
- Increases Sensitivity: Raises awareness within the legal system about appropriate language.
- Modernizes Legal Code: Updates the District of Columbia Official Code to reflect current standards.
- Sets a Positive Example: Encourages other jurisdictions to update their legal language.
- Improves Public Perception: Enhances the perception of the justice system as fair and considerate.
Potential Disadvantages
- Limited Scope: The bill only addresses terminology and does not address systemic issues faced by individuals with intellectual disabilities.
- Potential for Further Updates: The term "moderate intellectual disabilities" may also become outdated in the future, requiring further amendments.
- No Direct Impact on Services: The bill does not directly improve services or support for individuals with intellectual disabilities.
- Risk of Oversimplification: The change in terminology might not fully capture the spectrum of intellectual disabilities.
- Potential for Unintended Consequences: While unlikely, changes in legal language can sometimes lead to unforeseen legal interpretations.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the principles of equal protection and dignity, although these are not explicitly stated in the original Constitution but are interpreted through the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. The 14th Amendment ensures that all individuals are treated equally under the law.
While the Constitution does not directly address specific terminology related to disabilities, the spirit of ensuring justice and fairness for all citizens supports the intent of this bill. The bill does not infringe upon any specific rights or powers outlined in the Constitution.
Furthermore, Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 grants Congress the power to legislate for the District of Columbia, providing the constitutional basis for this bill.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).