S.880 - Fair College Admissions for Students Act (119th Congress)
Summary
The Fair College Admissions for Students Act aims to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965. It seeks to prohibit institutions of higher education that participate in Federal student assistance programs from giving preferential treatment in admissions to legacy students or donors. The bill was introduced in the Senate by Mr. Merkley, Mr. Kennedy, and Mr. Padilla and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this bill would eliminate legacy and donor preferences in college admissions for institutions receiving federal student aid. This could lead to a more level playing field for applicants. The change would take effect on the first day of the second award year after the enactment date.
Potential Benefits
- Increased fairness in college admissions, potentially benefiting students from underrepresented backgrounds.
- Reduced influence of wealth and privilege in higher education access.
- Could lead to a more diverse student body, enriching the educational environment.
- May encourage institutions to focus on merit and potential rather than legacy or donations.
- Could improve public perception of higher education institutions.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- May reduce donations to colleges and universities, potentially impacting financial aid or other programs.
- Could face resistance from alumni and donors who benefit from the current system.
- Some argue that legacy preferences help maintain institutional traditions and alumni engagement.
- It might be seen as government overreach into institutional autonomy.
- Potential legal challenges based on equal protection or other constitutional grounds.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the general principles of equal opportunity, though the Constitution does not explicitly address college admissions policies. Congress has the power to regulate interstate commerce and to set conditions on the receipt of federal funds, which provides a basis for this legislation under Article I, Section 8. The bill does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights, such as freedom of speech or religion (Amendment I).
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).