In God We Trust Act
Summary
The "In God We Trust Act" mandates the Administrator of General Services to display or inscribe the national motto of the United States on all Federal buildings within one year of the Act's enactment. The bill defines 'public building' by referencing section 3301(a) of title 40, United States Code. The motto to be displayed is described in section 302 of title 36, United States Code.
The Act aims to visibly reinforce the national motto in public spaces. It seeks to promote a sense of national identity and shared values.
The bill's impact is primarily symbolic, focusing on the visual presence of the national motto.
Expected Effects
The primary effect will be the physical addition of the motto "In God We Trust" to all federal buildings. This could lead to increased visibility of the motto and potentially spark public discourse about its meaning and appropriateness on government property.
The change will be aesthetic and potentially symbolic, with limited direct impact on government operations or individual rights.
Potential Benefits
- Increased visibility of the national motto.
- Potential reinforcement of national identity.
- May foster a sense of shared values among some citizens.
- Could be seen as a patriotic gesture.
- Minimal direct cost beyond the inscription/display itself.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential alienation of individuals who do not subscribe to the motto's implied religious sentiment.
- Possible legal challenges based on the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
- May be perceived as government endorsement of religion.
- Could be seen as a divisive act in a diverse society.
- The cost of implementation, while likely minimal, could be directed elsewhere.
Constitutional Alignment
The Act's constitutional alignment is questionable, particularly concerning the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits government endorsement of religion. While the motto has historical significance, its display on federal buildings could be interpreted as a violation of the separation of church and state. The Supreme Court has addressed similar issues, and the outcome of potential legal challenges is uncertain.
However, the Act does not explicitly compel religious observance or discriminate against any particular religion. Arguments in favor of its constitutionality might emphasize the motto's historical context and its role as a secular expression of national values.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).