Honoring Charlie Kirk following his assassination on September 10, 2025, in Orem, Utah.
Summary
House Resolution 695 addresses the assassination of Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, in Orem, Utah. The resolution condemns the act, offers condolences, and recognizes the service of first responders. It also reaffirms the principles of freedom of assembly and democratic participation.
Expected Effects
The resolution serves as a formal condemnation and expression of sympathy. It reinforces the importance of the First Amendment rights, particularly the right to assemble peaceably. However, it does not enact any new laws or policies.
Potential Benefits
- Formal condemnation of political violence.
- Expression of support for the victim's family and community.
- Recognition of first responders and healthcare professionals.
- Reaffirmation of First Amendment rights.
- Reinforcement of democratic principles.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Does not offer concrete solutions to prevent future violence.
- May be perceived as a purely symbolic gesture.
- Could be interpreted as politically divisive, depending on individual viewpoints.
- No direct economic or social benefits are provided.
- Lacks specific measures to address the root causes of political extremism.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution aligns with the First Amendment of the US Constitution, which protects the right of the people to peaceably assemble. It also indirectly supports the principles of freedom of speech and expression. The condemnation of violence aligns with the broader constitutional goal of ensuring domestic tranquility, as stated in the Preamble.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).