Expressing the sense of Congress that any public rendition of The Star-Spangled Banner must be performed as written by Francis Scott Key, in English.
Summary
This concurrent resolution expresses the sense of Congress that public renditions of "The Star-Spangled Banner" should be performed as written by Francis Scott Key, in English. It emphasizes the historical and cultural significance of the anthem's original English lyrics. The resolution encourages performers and organizers to honor this tradition to maintain the anthem's unifying significance and historical context.
Expected Effects
The resolution, if passed, would likely influence public performances of the national anthem. It may lead to increased scrutiny and potential criticism of performances that deviate from the original English lyrics. However, as a concurrent resolution, it does not have the force of law.
Potential Benefits
- Preserves the historical and cultural integrity of the national anthem.
- Reinforces a shared understanding of American heritage and patriotism.
- Honors the original intent and context of the anthem.
- Promotes unity through a common linguistic experience.
- May foster a greater appreciation for the anthem's historical significance.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Could be perceived as limiting artistic expression and creativity in performances.
- May alienate individuals who prefer or understand alternative interpretations or translations.
- Potentially creates unnecessary controversy around performances of the national anthem.
- Might be seen as an attempt to impose a specific cultural viewpoint.
- Could be interpreted as insensitive to non-English speakers.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution's alignment with the Constitution is complex. While it doesn't directly violate any specific clause, some might argue it treads on the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech, potentially limiting artistic expression in public performances. However, as a non-binding resolution, its impact on protected speech is minimal. The resolution does not establish a religion, so it does not violate the Establishment Clause.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).