Bills of Congress
Executive Orders
Supreme Court Opinions
Day
Week
Month
All

Showing 81–90 of 117 documents

Document Date Top Benefits Top Disadvantages Constitutional Actions
Supreme Court Opinions
Hittle v. City of Stockton (No. 24-427)
The document is a dissenting opinion by Justice Thomas, joined by Justice Gorsuch, regarding the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in the case of Hittle v. City of Stockton. The case concerns a Title VII religious discrimination claim. Justice Thomas … The document is a dissenting opinion by Justice Thomas, joined by Justice Gorsuch, regarding the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari …
—
Religious Freedom & Expression ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Bufkin v. Collins (No. 23-713)
The Supreme Court case Bufkin v. Collins (2025) addresses the standard of review that the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) must apply when reviewing the Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) application of the "benefit-of-the-doubt" rule in … The Supreme Court case Bufkin v. Collins (2025) addresses the standard of review that the U.S. Court of Appeals for …
— —
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Department of State v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition (No. 24A831)
This document pertains to a Supreme Court case, *Department of State v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition*, regarding a dispute over the pausing of foreign development assistance funds. The District Court initially issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the government's … This document pertains to a Supreme Court case, *Department of State v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition*, regarding a dispute over …
Public Health & Healthcare Access ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
International Standing & Cooperation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Fiscal Responsibility & Fair Taxation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
City and County of San Francisco v. EPA (No. 23-753)
The Supreme Court case *City and County of San Francisco v. EPA* (No. 23-753) addresses the EPA's authority under the Clean Water Act (CWA) to include 'end-result' provisions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. These provisions hold permittees … The Supreme Court case *City and County of San Francisco v. EPA* (No. 23-753) addresses the EPA's authority under the …
Business Prosperity & Innovation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Environmental Protection & Climate Action ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Public Health & Healthcare Access ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Speech First, Inc. v. Whitten (No. 24-361)
This document is Justice Thomas's dissent from the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in *Speech First, Inc. v. Whitten*. The case concerns a challenge to Indiana University's (IU) bias response team and its policies regarding the reporting and handling of … This document is Justice Thomas's dissent from the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in *Speech First, Inc. v. Whitten*. The …
—
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Education & Skill Development ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc. (No. 23-900)
The Supreme Court case Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc. (No. 23-900) addresses the calculation of profits in trademark infringement cases under the Lanham Act. The Court held that a prevailing plaintiff can only recover profits directly attributable to … The Supreme Court case Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc. (No. 23-900) addresses the calculation of profits in trademark …
Business Prosperity & Innovation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
—
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. (No. 23-971)
The Supreme Court case *Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.* addresses whether a voluntary dismissal of a case without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) qualifies as a "final proceeding" under Rule 60(b), which allows courts to relieve … The Supreme Court case *Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.* addresses whether a voluntary dismissal of a case without prejudice …
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
—
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Lackey v. Stinnie (No. 23-621)
The Supreme Court case Lackey v. Stinnie (No. 23-621) addresses whether plaintiffs who obtain a preliminary injunction, but whose case becomes moot before a final judgment, qualify as "prevailing parties" eligible for attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. §1988(b). The Court … The Supreme Court case Lackey v. Stinnie (No. 23-621) addresses whether plaintiffs who obtain a preliminary injunction, but whose case …
Fiscal Responsibility & Fair Taxation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Glossip v. Oklahoma (No. 22-7466)
The Supreme Court case *Glossip v. Oklahoma* (No. 22-7466), decided on February 25, 2025, addresses prosecutorial misconduct and the knowing use of false testimony in a capital murder trial. The Court reversed the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals' (OCCA) decision, … The Supreme Court case *Glossip v. Oklahoma* (No. 22-7466), decided on February 25, 2025, addresses prosecutorial misconduct and the knowing …
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Fiscal Responsibility & Fair Taxation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Public Safety & Crime Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Rimlawi v. United States (No. 24-23)
The document is a dissenting opinion by Justice Gorsuch regarding the denial of certiorari in three cases (Rimlawi v. United States, Shah v. United States, and Jacob v. United States) from the Fifth Circuit. The central issue is whether a … The document is a dissenting opinion by Justice Gorsuch regarding the denial of certiorari in three cases (Rimlawi v. United …
—
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source