Choosing Our Own Lives Over Fast Firearms Act; COOL OFF Act
Summary
The "Choosing Our Own Lives Over Fast Firearms Act" (COOL OFF Act) introduces a mandatory 3-day waiting period for handgun transfers between unlicensed individuals and by licensed dealers to non-licensees. There are exceptions for law enforcement, military personnel, loans between family members, and situations involving imminent danger or supervised activities like target shooting or hunting. The bill amends Section 922 of Title 18, United States Code, and includes penalties for violations, with an effective date 90 days after enactment.
Expected Effects
This bill aims to reduce impulsive acts of violence by imposing a waiting period before handgun acquisition. It may lead to fewer suicides and crimes committed with newly acquired handguns. However, it could also delay the ability of individuals to protect themselves in urgent situations.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially reduces impulsive acts of violence and suicides.
- May provide a "cooling off" period to prevent crimes of passion.
- Exemptions for law enforcement and self-defense situations mitigate potential negative impacts.
- Could lead to a decrease in gun-related injuries and deaths.
- May enhance public safety by preventing individuals with malicious intent from immediately acquiring handguns.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Delays the ability of individuals to exercise their Second Amendment right to bear arms for self-defense.
- May inconvenience law-abiding citizens who need a handgun for legitimate purposes.
- Could create a burden for individuals in rural areas with limited access to licensed dealers.
- The 3-day waiting period may not be effective in preventing all gun-related crimes.
- Potential for increased black market activity to circumvent the waiting period.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutionality is debatable, particularly concerning the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment guarantees the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, and some argue that a waiting period infringes upon this right. However, the Supreme Court has acknowledged the right is not unlimited and reasonable restrictions are permissible. The exceptions provided in the bill, such as for law enforcement and imminent danger, may strengthen its constitutionality by addressing immediate self-defense needs.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).