Bills of Congress by U.S. Congress

Cell-Site Simulator Warrant Act of 2025

Summary

The Cell-Site Simulator Warrant Act of 2025 aims to regulate the use of cell-site simulators (also known as "stingrays") by law enforcement and intelligence agencies. It mandates that, in most cases, a warrant is required before a cell-site simulator can be used. The bill also outlines exceptions for emergencies, foreign intelligence surveillance, research, protective services, contraband interdiction in correctional facilities, and testing/training.

Expected Effects

This act will likely increase transparency and oversight regarding the use of cell-site simulators. It could limit the use of these devices by requiring warrants and disclosures, potentially safeguarding individual privacy. However, exceptions for national security and emergencies could still allow for their use in certain situations.

Potential Benefits

  • Increased privacy protection due to warrant requirements.
  • Greater transparency through disclosure requirements in warrant applications.
  • Limits on the scope of data collection to minimize impact on non-targets.
  • Civil action allowed for unlawful cell-site simulator operations.
  • Oversight through Inspector General reports to Congress.

Potential Disadvantages

  • Exceptions for emergencies and national security could still allow for broad use without warrants.
  • Potential delays in law enforcement investigations due to warrant requirements.
  • Costs associated with FCC regulations and third-party testing.
  • Complexity of the regulations may lead to confusion and inconsistent application.
  • The act's effectiveness depends on strict enforcement and oversight.

Constitutional Alignment

The act attempts to balance the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures with the government's need to conduct surveillance for law enforcement and national security purposes. By requiring warrants in most cases, the act aligns with the Fourth Amendment's warrant clause. However, the exceptions for emergencies and foreign intelligence surveillance could raise concerns about potential violations of privacy rights.

Impact Assessment: Things You Care About

This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).