Bills of Congress
Executive Orders
Supreme Court Opinions
Day
Week
Month
All

Showing 211โ€“220 of 8240 documents

Document Date Top Benefits Top Disadvantages Constitutional Actions
Bills of Congress
H.R.es524 - Expressing support for the designation of June 19, 2025, as World Sickle Cell Awareness Day in order to increase public awareness across the United States and global community about sickle cell disease and the continued need for empirical research, early detection screenings, novel effective treatments leading to a cure, and preventative care programs with respect to complications from sickle cell anemia and conditions relating to sickle cell disease. (119th Congress)
H.Res.524 expresses support for designating June 19, 2025, as "World Sickle Cell Awareness Day." The resolution aims to increase public awareness of sickle cell disease (SCD) and sickle cell trait (SCT). It also emphasizes the need for continued research, early โ€ฆ H.Res.524 expresses support for designating June 19, 2025, as "World Sickle Cell Awareness Day." The resolution aims to increase public โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Bills of Congress
H.Con.Res.39 - Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center for a ceremony to present the Congressional Gold Medals awarded under the Harlem Hellfighters Congressional Gold Medal Act. (119th Congress)
H.Con.Res.39 authorizes the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center on September 3, 2025, for a ceremony to present the Congressional Gold Medals awarded under the Harlem Hellfighters Congressional Gold Medal Act (Public Law 117-38). The resolution directs โ€ฆ H.Con.Res.39 authorizes the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center on September 3, 2025, for a ceremony to โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Bills of Congress
H.R.es528 - Expressing support for the designation of June 19, 2025, as Veterans of the Republic of Vietnam Armed Forces Day. (119th Congress)
H.Res.528 expresses support for designating June 19, 2025, as "Veterans of the Republic of Vietnam Armed Forces Day." The resolution acknowledges the sacrifices and contributions of the South Vietnamese Armed Forces during the Vietnam War and their subsequent integration into โ€ฆ H.Res.528 expresses support for designating June 19, 2025, as "Veterans of the Republic of Vietnam Armed Forces Day." The resolution โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Bills of Congress
H.R.es526 - Recognizing the importance of pollinators to ecosystem health and agriculture in the United States by designating June 15 through June 22, 2025, as National Pollinator Week. (119th Congress)
H.Res.526 designates June 15 through June 22, 2025, as "National Pollinator Week." The resolution recognizes the critical role pollinators play in agriculture and ecosystem health. It highlights the economic value of pollinators and the threats they face. H.Res.526 designates June 15 through June 22, 2025, as "National Pollinator Week." The resolution recognizes the critical role pollinators play โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Bills of Congress
H.R.3230 - Financial Institution Regulatory Tailoring Enhancement Act (119th Congress)
H.R. 3230, the Financial Institution Regulatory Tailoring Enhancement Act, seeks to increase the asset thresholds at which financial institutions become subject to certain regulatory requirements. Specifically, it raises the threshold from $10 billion to $50 billion in assets for regulations โ€ฆ H.R. 3230, the Financial Institution Regulatory Tailoring Enhancement Act, seeks to increase the asset thresholds at which financial institutions become โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Stanley v. City of Sanford (No. 23-997)
The Supreme Court case *Stanley v. City of Sanford* (2025) addresses whether Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) protects retirees from disability-based discrimination regarding retirement benefits. The Court held that to prevail under ยง12112(a), a plaintiff must โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Stanley v. City of Sanford* (2025) addresses whether Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Esteras v. United States (No. 23-7483)
The Supreme Court case *Esteras v. United States* (2025) addresses whether district courts can consider retribution when revoking supervised release. The Court held that district courts cannot consider 18 U.S.C. ยง3553(a)(2)(A), which concerns retribution for the original offense, when deciding โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Esteras v. United States* (2025) addresses whether district courts can consider retribution when revoking supervised release. โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA (No. 24-7)
The Supreme Court case *Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA* (No. 24-7) concerns the standing of fuel producers to challenge the EPA's approval of California regulations under the Clean Air Act. These regulations mandate that automakers manufacture more electric vehicles โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA* (No. 24-7) concerns the standing of fuel producers to challenge โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co. (No. 23-1187)
The Supreme Court case *FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co.* (No. 23-1187) concerns the ability of retailers to challenge FDA decisions regarding the marketing of new tobacco products. The court held that retailers who would sell a new tobacco โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co.* (No. 23-1187) concerns the ability of retailers to challenge โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp. (No. 23-1226)
The Supreme Court case *McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.* (No. 23-1226) concerns the interpretation of the Hobbs Act and its impact on district courts' ability to review agency interpretations of statutes in enforcement proceedings. The Court held that โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.* (No. 23-1226) concerns the interpretation of the Hobbs Act โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source