Bills of Congress
Executive Orders
Supreme Court Opinions
Day
Week
Month
All

Showing 81–90 of 111 documents

Document Date Top Benefits Top Disadvantages Constitutional Actions
Supreme Court Opinions
Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. (No. 23-971)
The Supreme Court case *Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.* addresses whether a voluntary dismissal of a case without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) qualifies as a "final proceeding" under Rule 60(b), which allows courts to relieve … The Supreme Court case *Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.* addresses whether a voluntary dismissal of a case without prejudice …
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
—
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Lackey v. Stinnie (No. 23-621)
The Supreme Court case Lackey v. Stinnie (No. 23-621) addresses whether plaintiffs who obtain a preliminary injunction, but whose case becomes moot before a final judgment, qualify as "prevailing parties" eligible for attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. §1988(b). The Court … The Supreme Court case Lackey v. Stinnie (No. 23-621) addresses whether plaintiffs who obtain a preliminary injunction, but whose case …
Fiscal Responsibility & Fair Taxation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Glossip v. Oklahoma Revisions: 2/25/25 (No. 22-7466)
The Supreme Court case *Glossip v. Oklahoma* (No. 22-7466), decided on February 25, 2025, addresses prosecutorial misconduct and the knowing use of false testimony in a capital murder trial. The Court reversed the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals' (OCCA) decision, … The Supreme Court case *Glossip v. Oklahoma* (No. 22-7466), decided on February 25, 2025, addresses prosecutorial misconduct and the knowing …
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Fiscal Responsibility & Fair Taxation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Public Safety & Crime Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Carter v. United States (No. 23-1281)
The document is a dissent from a denial of certiorari in the case of Carter v. United States. Justice Thomas argues that the Supreme Court should revisit the Feres doctrine, a judicially created exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act … The document is a dissent from a denial of certiorari in the case of Carter v. United States. Justice Thomas …
Public Health & Healthcare Access ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Fiscal Responsibility & Fair Taxation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
National Security & Defense ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Coalition Life v. Carbondale (No. 24-57)
This document is a dissent from the denial of certiorari in the case of *Coalition Life v. Carbondale*. Justice Thomas argues that the Court should have taken the case to clarify the status of *Hill v. Colorado*, a case upholding … This document is a dissent from the denial of certiorari in the case of *Coalition Life v. Carbondale*. Justice Thomas …
—
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Gonzalez v. United States (No. 24-5577)
The Supreme Court denied certiorari in Gonzalez v. United States, a case concerning whether the Fourth Amendment incorporates the common-law 'in-the-presence' requirement for warrantless misdemeanor arrests. Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Gorsuch, issued a statement respecting the denial, highlighting the … The Supreme Court denied certiorari in Gonzalez v. United States, a case concerning whether the Fourth Amendment incorporates the common-law …
Public Safety & Crime Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Pina v. Dominguez (No. 24-152)
This document is a dissenting opinion by Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, regarding the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in the case of Pina v. Dominguez. The case concerns the qualified immunity of a police officer (Pina) who used … This document is a dissenting opinion by Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, regarding the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari …
—
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Woodward v. California (No. 24-227)
The document is a statement by Justice Sotomayor regarding the denial of certiorari in the case of Woodward v. California. The case concerns the potential violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Woodward was tried twice for … The document is a statement by Justice Sotomayor regarding the denial of certiorari in the case of Woodward v. California. …
—
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Rimlawi v. United States (No. 24-23)
The document is a dissenting opinion by Justice Gorsuch regarding the denial of certiorari in three cases (Rimlawi v. United States, Shah v. United States, and Jacob v. United States) from the Fifth Circuit. The central issue is whether a … The document is a dissenting opinion by Justice Gorsuch regarding the denial of certiorari in three cases (Rimlawi v. United …
—
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Heath (No. 23-1127)
The Supreme Court case *Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Heath* (2025) concerns whether reimbursement requests under the E-Rate program qualify as "claims" under the False Claims Act (FCA). The Court held that E-Rate reimbursement requests do qualify … The Supreme Court case *Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Heath* (2025) concerns whether reimbursement requests under the …
Fiscal Responsibility & Fair Taxation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Education & Skill Development ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
—
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source