Bills of Congress
Executive Orders
Supreme Court Opinions
Day
Week
Month
All

Showing 21โ€“30 of 111 documents

Document Date Top Benefits Top Disadvantages Constitutional Actions
Supreme Court Opinions
Esteras v. United States (No. 23-7483)
The Supreme Court case *Esteras v. United States* (2025) addresses whether district courts can consider retribution when revoking supervised release. The Court held that district courts cannot consider 18 U.S.C. ยง3553(a)(2)(A), which concerns retribution for the original offense, when deciding โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Esteras v. United States* (2025) addresses whether district courts can consider retribution when revoking supervised release. โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA (No. 24-7)
The Supreme Court case *Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA* (No. 24-7) concerns the standing of fuel producers to challenge the EPA's approval of California regulations under the Clean Air Act. These regulations mandate that automakers manufacture more electric vehicles โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA* (No. 24-7) concerns the standing of fuel producers to challenge โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co. (No. 23-1187)
The Supreme Court case *FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co.* (No. 23-1187) concerns the ability of retailers to challenge FDA decisions regarding the marketing of new tobacco products. The court held that retailers who would sell a new tobacco โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co.* (No. 23-1187) concerns the ability of retailers to challenge โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp. (No. 23-1226)
The Supreme Court case *McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.* (No. 23-1226) concerns the interpretation of the Hobbs Act and its impact on district courts' ability to review agency interpretations of statutes in enforcement proceedings. The Court held that โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.* (No. 23-1226) concerns the interpretation of the Hobbs Act โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Oklahoma v. EPA (No. 23-1067)
The Supreme Court case *Oklahoma v. EPA* (2025) addresses the venue for challenging the EPA's disapproval of state implementation plans (SIPs) under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The Court held that EPA's disapprovals of Oklahoma and Utah's SIPs are locally โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Oklahoma v. EPA* (2025) addresses the venue for challenging the EPA's disapproval of state implementation plans โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Perttu v. Richards (No. 23-1324)
The Supreme Court case Perttu v. Richards (2025) addresses whether a party has the right to a jury trial on Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) exhaustion when the exhaustion issue is intertwined with the merits of the underlying claim. The โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case Perttu v. Richards (2025) addresses whether a party has the right to a jury trial on โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
United States v. Skrmetti (No. 23-477)
The Supreme Court case *United States v. Skrmetti* (2025) concerns a Tennessee law (SB1) that restricts gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender minors. The Court held that SB1 does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *United States v. Skrmetti* (2025) concerns a Tennessee law (SB1) that restricts gender-affirming medical treatments for โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C. (No. 23-1229)
The Supreme Court case *EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C.* (No. 23-1229) addresses the venue for judicial review of EPA actions under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The central issue is whether the EPA's denial of small refinery exemptions from โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C.* (No. 23-1229) addresses the venue for judicial review of EPA โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
NRC v. Texas (No. 23-1300)
The Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit's decision in *NRC v. Texas*, holding that Texas and Fasken were not entitled to judicial review of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) licensing decision regarding a private off-site nuclear waste storage facility. The โ€ฆ The Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit's decision in *NRC v. Texas*, holding that Texas and Fasken were not entitled โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Commissioner v. Zuch (No. 24-416)
The Supreme Court case *Commissioner v. Zuch* (2025) addresses the jurisdiction of the U.S. Tax Court in collection due process (CDP) hearings when the IRS is no longer pursuing a levy. The court held that the Tax Court lacks jurisdiction โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Commissioner v. Zuch* (2025) addresses the jurisdiction of the U.S. Tax Court in collection due process โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source