Bills of Congress
Executive Orders
Supreme Court Opinions
Day
Week
Month
All

Showing 1–10 of 111 documents

Document Date Top Benefits Top Disadvantages Constitutional Actions
Supreme Court Opinions
Department of Homeland Security v. D.V.D. (No. 24A1153)
This document pertains to the Supreme Court's decision to grant a stay on a preliminary injunction issued by a lower court regarding the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) practice of removing non-citizens to third countries. The injunction required DHS to … This document pertains to the Supreme Court's decision to grant a stay on a preliminary injunction issued by a lower …
—
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Montana v. Planned Parenthood of Montana (No. 24-745)
The Supreme Court denied certiorari in the case of Montana v. Planned Parenthood of Montana. The case concerned Montana's Parental Consent for Abortion Act, which requires parental consent for minors seeking abortions. The Montana Supreme Court struck down the law … The Supreme Court denied certiorari in the case of Montana v. Planned Parenthood of Montana. The case concerned Montana's Parental …
—
Family & Community Well-being ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Black v. Tennessee (No. 24-6586)
The document is a statement by Justice Sotomayor regarding the denial of certiorari in the case of Black v. Tennessee. The case concerns jury instructions in Tennessee voluntary manslaughter cases, specifically the requirement that the prosecution prove a 'state of … The document is a statement by Justice Sotomayor regarding the denial of certiorari in the case of Black v. Tennessee. …
—
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
GHP Management Corp. v. City of Los Angeles (No. 24-435)
This document is Justice Thomas's dissent from the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in *GHP Management Corp. v. City of Los Angeles*. The case concerns the City of Los Angeles's eviction moratorium enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic, which prevented landlords … This document is Justice Thomas's dissent from the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in *GHP Management Corp. v. City of …
Public Health & Healthcare Access ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Economic Growth & Job Creation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Business Prosperity & Innovation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Wiggins v. United States (No. 24-6410)
The document is a statement by Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Barrett, regarding the denial of certiorari in the case of Wiggins v. United States. The case concerns a disagreement among the Courts of Appeals about the definition of a … The document is a statement by Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Barrett, regarding the denial of certiorari in the case …
—
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
MacRae v. Mattos (No. 24-355)
The document is a statement by Justice Thomas regarding the denial of certiorari in the case of MacRae v. Mattos. The case concerns the firing of Kari MacRae by Hanover Public Schools for her pre-employment political expression on TikTok. Justice … The document is a statement by Justice Thomas regarding the denial of certiorari in the case of MacRae v. Mattos. …
—
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Education & Skill Development ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Goldey v. Fields (No. 24-809)
The Supreme Court case Goldey v. Fields (No. 24-809) addresses whether a federal prisoner can sue federal prison officials for damages under Bivens for alleged excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The Court reversed the Fourth Circuit's decision, … The Supreme Court case Goldey v. Fields (No. 24-809) addresses whether a federal prisoner can sue federal prison officials for …
Fiscal Responsibility & Fair Taxation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Mahmoud v. Taylor (No. 24-297)
The Supreme Court case *Mahmoud v. Taylor* (2025) addresses the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment in the context of public education. The Court held that the Montgomery County Board of Education's policy of including LGBTQ+-inclusive storybooks in the … The Supreme Court case *Mahmoud v. Taylor* (2025) addresses the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment in the context …
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Religious Freedom & Expression ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Family & Community Well-being ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Fiscal Responsibility & Fair Taxation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Education & Skill Development ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
FCC v. Consumers’ Research (No. 24-354)
The Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit's decision, holding that the FCC's universal-service contribution scheme does not violate the nondelegation doctrine. The Court found that Congress provided sufficient guidance and constraints to the FCC in implementing the universal-service contribution scheme. … The Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit's decision, holding that the FCC's universal-service contribution scheme does not violate the nondelegation …
Public Health & Healthcare Access ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Education & Skill Development ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Fiscal Responsibility & Fair Taxation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Trump v. CASA, Inc. Revisions: 7/02/25 (No. 24A884)
The Supreme Court case *Trump v. CASA, Inc.* (2025) addresses the legality of universal injunctions, specifically concerning President Trump's Executive Order No. 14160, which sought to limit birthright citizenship. The Court granted partial stays of lower court injunctions, limiting their … The Supreme Court case *Trump v. CASA, Inc.* (2025) addresses the legality of universal injunctions, specifically concerning President Trump's Executive …
—
Social Equity & Poverty Reduction ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Individual Liberties, Rights & Privacy ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Justice System Fairness & Rule of Law ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
 View Source