287(g) Program Protection Act
Summary
The "287(g) Program Protection Act" aims to amend section 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, seeking to clarify congressional intent regarding agreements between the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and state/local law enforcement agencies for immigration enforcement. It mandates DHS to enter into agreements with states or political subdivisions upon request, absent a compelling reason for denial. The bill also seeks to ensure that the 287(g) program is prioritized and adequately funded.
Expected Effects
This act would likely lead to an increase in the number of 287(g) agreements between DHS and state/local law enforcement agencies. It could also result in more consistent and standardized training for officers participating in the program. The changes aim to strengthen immigration enforcement at the state and local levels.
Potential Benefits
- Increased cooperation between federal and local law enforcement in immigration enforcement.
- Standardized training for law enforcement officers involved in the 287(g) program.
- Enhanced ability for states and political subdivisions to address their specific immigration enforcement needs.
- Greater transparency and accountability through annual performance reports and recruitment plans.
- Dedicated funding stream for the 287(g) program.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for increased strain on state and local resources due to the cost of participating in the program.
- Risk of civil rights violations and discriminatory practices by law enforcement officers.
- Concerns about the impact on community relations and trust in law enforcement.
- Possible diversion of resources from other public safety priorities.
- Increased apprehension and removal of aliens, which may have negative economic and social consequences.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's alignment with the Constitution is complex. Article I, Section 8 grants Congress the power to establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization. The Tenth Amendment reserves powers not delegated to the federal government to the states, potentially raising questions about the extent to which the federal government can compel states to participate in immigration enforcement. The Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and seizures are also relevant, as the actions of state and local officers under 287(g) agreements must comply with these protections.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).